The case for paper
Paper journals have real advantages that digital tools cannot fully replicate.
No distractions. When you open a paper journal, there are no notifications, no suggested apps, no battery warnings. The act of writing by hand requires more cognitive engagement than typing, and some research suggests this increases emotional processing depth.
Absolute privacy. A paper journal stored securely is as private as any medium can be. There is no cloud, no server, no third-party company whose data practices you need to evaluate.
No interface friction. You do not need to remember a password, update an app, or navigate a UI. You open it and write.
The case for digital
Digital journaling apps have advantages that paper cannot match in certain use cases.
Searchability. A year of daily entries is impractical to search by hand. A digital journal lets you find every time you wrote about a specific person, feeling, or event in seconds. This is genuinely useful for pattern-spotting over time.
Portability. Your journal is wherever your phone is. The moment you have a thought worth capturing, you can.
Connection to therapy. A digital journaling app that connects to your clinician's workflow, allowing you to share selected entries, receive homework assignments, and contribute to pre-session data, is something paper simply cannot do. This use case is specific to apps like Betterjournal that were designed for this context.
The privacy question
The biggest legitimate concern about digital journaling is data privacy. Most general journaling apps, Day One, Notion, Google Keep, store your data on US servers and are subject to US law. Some sell or share data with third parties. For personal journaling this may be acceptable. For journaling that is part of a therapeutic relationship, it is worth evaluating carefully.
If you are choosing a digital journal for therapeutic use, look for: Canadian server storage, explicit informed consent before data collection, end-to-end encryption, and a clear privacy policy that specifies no third-party sharing. Betterjournal is built to these standards specifically for the Canadian clinical context.
Which should you choose
If you are journaling for personal reflection or creativity, and privacy is your primary concern, paper is an excellent choice. It has no dependencies and requires no trust in any technology company.
If you are in therapy and want your journaling practice to be part of your therapeutic work, a digital app designed for that context is more appropriate than paper. The ability to share entries, receive structured homework, and contribute to a pre-session brief is functionality paper cannot provide.
Many people use both: a paper journal for personal reflection and a therapy-connected app for their clinical work. This is a sensible combination.
Sources
- Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168.
- Pennebaker, J. W., & Smyth, J. M. (2016). Opening up by writing it down: How expressive writing improves health and eases emotional pain (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta. (2023). Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Government of Alberta.
Try Betterjournal
Built for therapy clients and their clinicians. Private by default. Always free for clients in Canada.
Learn more for clients